Category: Hot Trends: Developing Case Law
-
02.03.2020
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Updates Orphans’ Court Rules
Effective January 1, 2020, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued several Orphans’ Court rule changes including the following: Rule 1.7 added a comment that withdrawal of counsel before the Register of Wills is subject to local rules or the discretion of the Register and may be different from the procedure of withdrawal of appearance in the […]
Read More -
12.18.2019
Estate Creditor’s Lien Inferior to IRS Claim
In re Estate of Forgett, No. A-0443-17T4, 2019 WL 4165062 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. September 3, 2019 Lisa Farina, a creditor of the estate, appealed orders declaring the estate to be insolvent, approving the estate’s final account, and directing distribution of the estate’s assets. Farina argued that (i) her judgment against the estate had […]
Read More -
10.29.2019
Court Finds No Abuse Of Discretion In Denying Fee Award Because Beneficiary Has The Right To Examine Executor’s Use Of Estate Funds
In re Estate of Biber, A-3970-17T3 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. June 11, 2019). The Appellate Division analyzed issues surrounding the actions of a guardian of an incapacitated adult. Anna Biber had two children: Peter Biber and Sheldon Biber. Joshua Biber – Anna’s grandson – was the only son of Sheldon. Peter and Joshua were […]
Read More -
10.29.2019
Party Who Seeks Fees Must Show Non-Prevailing Party Acted in “Bad Faith”
In re Estate of Gallegan, A-4256-17T4 9 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. June 26, 2019). Ralph A. Gallegan died testate, leaving his estate to seven of his nine children. He owned two parcels of real estate in New Jersey. The estate administrator filed a complaint for instruction regarding the real property. One of decedent’s sons, […]
Read More -
10.10.2019
NJSBA Reacts to Proposed Guardianship Rule Changes
The NJSBA submitted comments on the proposed New Jersey guardianship statutes and portions of Title 3B. The proposal is an overhaul of the guardianship act and the NJSBA’s Elder and Disability Law Section felt the changes may not accomplish the intended goals and could hurt New Jersey’s most vulnerable residents. See the letter at: https://tcms.njsba.com/personifyebusiness/Portals/0/NJSBA-PDF/Reports%20&%20Comments/Guardianship.pdf.
Read More -
10.10.2019
Beneficiary Waits too Long to File Claim Against Estate
In re Estate of Tuzzolo, P-104-19, slip op. (N.J. Super. Ct. Ch. Div. June 5, 2019). Plaintiff Susan Bechaw (“Bechaw”) and defendant Francine Cenicola (“Cenicola”) were daughters of the decedent, Philomena Tuzzolo. When the decedent passed away in December 2008, Cenicola was appointed executrix of the decedent’s estate. Two and a half years after the […]
Read More -
10.10.2019
Elective Share is Needs Based and Presumption that Joint Account Passes to Survivor is Rebuttable
In re Estate of Giordano, No. P-085-18 (Ch. Div. June 10, 2019). The court highlighted two propositions: (1) New Jersey’s elective share statute is needs based and can be awarded upon a finding that the election is necessary to provide adequate support of the surviving spouse during her probable life expectancy; and (2) the New […]
Read More -
09.11.2019
In PA, a Name is Enough: No Need to Identify Corporate Assets To Make Valid Transfer to Trust
In re Passarelli Family Trust, 206 A.3d 1188 (PA Super 2019) The Superior Court of Pennsylvania reversed a decree entered in the Orphans’ Court Division of the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County granting the petition of Margaret Passarelli to terminate an irrevocable trust (the “Trust”). Joseph and Margaret Passarelli were married on November […]
Read More -
09.11.2019
No Attorneys’ Fees Awarded In Will Contest Where Case Had “Obvious Legal and Factual Weakness[es]”
In re the Estate of Connolly, No. A-3855-17T1, 2019 WL 1578804 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Apr. 12, 2019). This case involves a purported will drafted by an attorney who never met the decedent. The attorney drafted the will based on a telephone conversation he had with the decedent, who was then ninety (90) years […]
Read More -
09.11.2019
Litigant “Entitled to Fair and Reasonable Opportunity to Litigate”
De Paul vs. Estate of De Paul, A-0887-16t2, 2019 WL 1831554 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. April 25, 2019). This action considered the reach of the entire controversy doctrine. The dispute stemmed from the disposition of a residential property in Mays Landing owned by the decedent, Catherine De Paul (“Catherine”). Catherine died testate in December […]
Read More