Category: Hot Trends: Developing Case Law
-
04.19.2024
Don’t Forget to Label Your Beneficiary Designation Forms with the Correct Account Number: A Cautionary Tale
Quick v. Morgan Stanley, Docket No. A-0443-21 (N.J. Super. App. Div. Jun. 29, 2023) This matter arises from a dispute over the rightful beneficiaries of a Roth IRA held by the decedent. Frederick Quick (“Decedent”) died leaving, in relevant part, a Roth IRA with Morgan Stanley. The Decedent was predeceased by his spouse (“Marie”) and […]
Read More -
04.16.2024
Estate Can Sue Ex-Spouse to Recover Retirement Funds
In re Estate of Petronaci, Docket No. A-3842-21 (N.J. Super. App. Div. Jan. 10, 2024) Brian Petronaci (“Decedent”) was married to defendant Laurie Voight (“Laurie”) from 2008 to 2015. Section 9 of the couple’s Marital Settlement Agreement (“MSA”) stipulated that each party waived any interest in the other’s retirement benefits. Section 2.2 of the MSA […]
Read More -
04.09.2024
Federal Regulations Preempt Inconsistent State Law
In re Jones, Docket No. A-2944-21 (N.J. Super. App. Div. Nov., 14, 2023) Michael Jones (“Decedent”) was married to Jeanine Jones (“Jeanine”) in 1990. The couple divorced in January 2018. The Decedent and Jeanine’s Divorce Settlement Agreement (“DSA”) stipulated, in relevant part, that any retirement and bank accounts would be retained by the party in […]
Read More -
04.01.2024
Doctrine of Laches Properly Applied Where Verified Complaint filed Over a Decade After Decedent’s Death
In re Estate of Dornic, Docket No. 2414-21 (N.J. Super. App. Div. Feb. 27, 2024) This case concerns a complaint that was dismissed under the doctrine of laches. The Appellate Division affirmed. Olga Dornic (“Decedent”) died intestate on February 3, 2008. The Decedent was never married, had no children, and left no living parents, siblings, […]
Read More -
03.29.2024
New Jersey Statutes Closing “Black Hole” of Litigation to be Applied Retroactively
Roik v. Roik, Docket No. A-2522-21 (N.J. Super. App. Div. Nov. 27, 2023) In August 2020, plaintiff Paul Roik (“Paul”) filed for divorce from defendant Anita Roik (“Anita”), his spouse of 46 years. The couple had three children together, all of whom are adults. In 2013, long before filing for divorce, Paul had executed a […]
Read More -
03.26.2024
Will Contest Based on Decedent’s Ability to Speak English Rejected
In re Estate of Bardizbanian, Docket No. A-3370-21 (N.J. Super. App. Div. Mar. 5, 2024) Siran Bardizbanian (“Decedent”) died on March 9, 2021. Decedent’s daughter, Maggie, sought to reject Decedent’s November 6, 2000 will (“2000 Will”), which disinherited her. Decedent’s son, Gary, was a proponent of the 2000 Will, of which he was the named […]
Read More -
03.22.2024
Appellate Division Invokes Cy Pres Doctrine to Further Decedent’s Charitable Intent
Matter of Estate of Heinecke, No. A-3604-21, 2024 WL 1125186 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. March 15, 2024) This case centers around the modification of a will under the cy pres doctrine. Barbara Heinecke (“Decedent”) died testate on April 9, 2021. The relevant portion of her Last Will and Testament dated January 19, 2012 (“Will”) […]
Read More -
03.20.2024
Tax Court Finds Self-Dealing Where Power of Attorney Withdrew IRA Funds For Her Own Benefit
Balint v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, T.C. Memo. 2023-118 (2023) Petitioner Joseph Michael Balint (“Petitioner”) brought suit against the IRS, for a tax assessment related to withdrawals made from his IRA and his life insurance by his spouse, Jacqueline Grimes Balint (“Jacqueline”), acting as his agent under a power of attorney. During the 2014 tax […]
Read More -
03.18.2024
Claims of Oral Will Rejected
In re Estate of Wasowicz, 2023 WL 8069402, No. A-3620-21 (N.J. Super. App. Div. Nov. 21, 2023) This case focused on whether an oral agreement made in 1987, 35 years prior to death, is akin to a Will or, in the alternative, can be an enforceable oral contract in New Jersey. From 1971 to 1987 […]
Read More -
03.11.2024
Limitations Defined to Exception to “American Rule”: Fee Shifting in Guardianship Actions
In the Matter of A.D., 477 N.J. Super. 288 (App. Div. 2023) This published opinion defines limitations to the exception to the American Rule against fee shifting in guardianship actions. The case was initiated by the Sussex County Office of Adult Protective Services (“APS”). The court appointed Stephen Kossup as counsel and Brian Lundquist as […]
Read More